Journal of Heroic Literature

Journal of Heroic Literature

Investigating the position and role of the continuous pronoun "sh" in Siavash’s story and its impact on the epic and heroic aspects

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Qom University, Qom, Iran
2 PhD student in Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Qom University, Qom, Iran
Abstract
More than just an epic work, the Shahnameh is known as the most important document that gives cultural and linguistic identity to Iranians. Ferdowsi’s language has been a model for stability and refinement in later periods. Undoubtedly, one of the important steps in understanding a text and its language is to pay attention to the relationships between words in the chain of conjunctions of sentences (syntactic relationships).If the role of words is correctly identified, the ambiguities arising from the syntactic relations between words will be resolved and its epic aspect will also be more visible. Continuous pronouns are one of the types of words that have the necessary flexibility to rotate in the space of sentence conjunction. Therefore, in this study, using a library and text-oriented method and a descriptive-analytical method, the use of the continuous pronoun "sh" with emphasis on being continuous with the verb in Siavash's story and its effect on the epic aspect of Shahnameh has been studied and analyzed. From the study of the subject, it was found that the pronouns used in Siavash's story are about 288 cases, with the most use of this pronoun in the role of adverbial and its least use in the position of a subject pronoun.Of course, it should be said that one of the roles that has received less attention is the pronoun attached to the verb "sh", in the third person singular verb, in the role of the subject, and some have doubted its existence or calling it a subject pronoun or a redundant pronoun; however, in this study, cases were brought out in which there is no doubt about the subjectivity of the pronoun and this pronoun is included in the sentence with the object or complement and should be considered a subject pronoun, therefore, the view that such a pronoun does not exist is incorrect.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. Abolghasemi, M. (2014). Historical Grammar of the Persian Language. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
  2. Anvari, H., & Ahmadi Givi, H. (2007). Persian Grammar. (Vol 1). Tehran: Fatemi Cultural Institute. [In Persian]
  3. Anvari, H., & Ahmadi Givi, H. (2008). Persian Grammar. (Vol 2). Tehran: Fatemi Cultural Institute. [In Persian]
  4. Aydenloo, S. (2014). “Three Points of Historical Grammar in the Shahnameh and Heroic Texts”. Special Issue of the Academy (Grammar),  No. 10, 47-64. [In Persian]
  5. Bahar, M. T. (2009). Stylistics. (Vol 1). Tehran: Zovvar. [In Persian]
  6. Dehkhoda, ‘A. A. (2008). Dictionary. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  7. Farshidvard, Kh. (1991). A Brief Historical Dictionary of the Persian Language. Tehran: Zovvar. [In Persian]
  8. Farshidvard, Kh. (1992). Detailed grammar of today based on modern linguistics. (4th ed.). Tehran: Sokhan. [In Persian]
  9. Farshidvard, Kh. (1995). Discourses on Persian Grammar. Tehran: Amir Kabir. [In Persian]
  10. Fazilat, M. (1381). A rose in the wind. Kermanshah: Taq Bostan. [In Persian]
  11. Gharib, A., & et al. (1363). Persian grammar compiled by five professors. With the efforts of Amir Ashraf al-Kotabi. Tehran: Ashrafi. [In Persian]
  12. Irani, M., & Torkashvand, M. (2017). “Syntactic Analysis of the Co-role of the Pronoun with a View to the Structure of the Verb and the Role of Connected Pronouns in Passive-Emotional Sentences”. Literary Techniques, 9(18), 119-132. https://doi.org/ 10.22108/LIAR.2017.21398 [In Persian]
  13. Khaleghi Motlaq, J. (2007). Correction of the Shahnameh. (Vol 1). Tehran: Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia. [In Persian]
  14. Khaleghi Motlaq, J. (2009). Correction of the Shahnameh. (Vol 5., 3th ed.). Tehran: Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia. [In Persian]
  15. Khaleghi Motlaq, J. (2009). Notes on the Shahnameh. (Vol 9). Tehran: Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia. [In Persian]
  16. Khaleghi Motlaq, J. (2014). Correction of the Shahnameh. (Vol 2., 5th ed.). Tehran: Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia. [In Persian]
  17. Mahjoub, M. J. (1345). Khorasani style in Persian poetry. Tehran: Ferdows and Jami. [In Persian]
  18. Mehravaran, M. (1400). The book of the Persian verb of today. Qom: Qom University Press. [In Persian]
  19. Meshkowatdini, M. (1389). Persian grammar based on the theory of gerunds. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University Press. [In Persian]
  20. Natel Khanlari, P. (1395). History of the Persian language. Three volumes in one volume. Tehran: Farhang Nashr No. [In Persian]
  21. Safa, Z. (1995). History of Persian Literature. Tehran: Ferdowsi. [In Persian]
  22. Shafi'i, M. (1998). Shahnameh and Dastur. Tehran: Tehran University Press. [In Persian]
  23. Shamisa, S. (1999). Generalities of Stylistics. Tehran: Ferdowsi. [In Persian]
  24. Shari’at, M. J. (2008). Persian grammar. Tehran: Asatir. [In Persian]
  25. Sho’ar, J., & Anvari, H. (1991). The Battle of Rostam and Esfandiar. Tehran: ‘Elmi. [In Persian]
  26. Tabataba'i, ‘A. (2001). Descriptive Dictionary of Persian Grammar. Tehran: Contemporary Dictionary. [In Persian]
  27. Taheri Mobarakeh, G. M. (1999). Rostam and Sohrab. Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]
  28. Vahidian Kamyar, T., & ‘Omrani, Gh. (1385). Persian grammar. (Vol 1). Tehran: Samt. [In Persian]